Marilyn Monroe’s Home Could Soon Be Demolished

Ladies and gentlemen, gather around for an intriguing tale from the heart of Hollywood! It’s all about Marilyn Monroe’s former home in Brentwood, a property that carries not just a hefty price tag but a rich history. So, let’s dive into the details of the ongoing drama surrounding this iconic residence.

Imagine owning a piece of Hollywood history, a home once graced by Marilyn Monroe herself. This dream came true for Brinah Milstein, a real estate heiress, and Roy Bank, a reality TV producer, when they purchased Monroe’s Brentwood house for a whopping $8.35 million last summer. Their plan? To bulldoze the place and expand their adjacent home. But hold on, folks, because this story takes a dramatic twist!

The Los Angeles City Council recently voted to delay a decision on whether Milstein and Bank can demolish the house. Why the delay, you ask? Well, it all started back in September when Councilwoman Traci Park introduced a motion to preserve the Spanish colonial-style home as a historic site. This move, if approved, would prevent the couple from tearing it down.

Since then, the motion has seen approval from the Cultural Heritage Commission and the city council’s Planning and Land Use Committee. However, the final vote hit a snag due to ongoing legal battles. Park requested a postponement, citing recent court decisions and ongoing discussions between the City Attorney’s Office and the property owners.

Now, let’s rewind to the 1960s. Marilyn Monroe, the most recognizable woman on the planet, purchased this four-bedroom, three-bathroom home for $75,000. It was the only property she ever owned by herself, a sanctuary after her third marriage ended. Tragically, Monroe lived there for less than six months before her untimely death at 36 from a drug overdose in 1962.

Fast forward to today, and the house, now obscured from street view by hedges, still attracts fans who leave flowers and try to catch a glimpse of Monroe’s last home.

Despite this, Milstein and Bank argue that the house has undergone so many changes over the decades that it no longer holds any of Monroe’s personal touches. They claim there’s nothing left from Monroe’s time—no furniture, no paint chips, nothing.

In early June, a tentative court ruling favored the city, adding another layer of complexity to the case. In response, Milstein and Bank sued Los Angeles, alleging collusion and violations of codes to rush the landmark designation process. Their lawsuit points out that the house has been flagged as “potentially historic” since 2013, but it’s only now facing landmark status due to these recent “backroom machinations.”

Residents, including Milstein and Bank, worry that designating the house as a landmark will only increase tourist traffic, disrupting the neighborhood. The debate continues, and the fate of Monroe’s former home hangs in the balance, wrapped in legal red tape and public sentiment.

Stay tuned, folks, as this story unfolds. Will the house be preserved as a historic site, or will it give way to new development? Only time will tell in this classic clash between heritage and modernity in the heart of Hollywood.

Daily Mail